DeWalt DCS391 vs Makita XSH03Z: Cordless Circular Saws Compared

FriendsWithTools.io earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you. We do not test these tools ourselves — all claims are sourced from manufacturer specifications, retailer listings, and aggregated user reviews, each linked inline. Prices and ratings were verified on April 2026 and may have changed.

Two different approaches to the same job. The DeWalt DCS391 runs a traditional 6-1/2 inch blade on 20V MAX. The Makita XSH03Z runs the same size blade on 18V LXT with a brushless motor and a thinner kerf blade. Both cut 2x4s in a single pass and handle plywood ripping with a guide. The differences show up in motor efficiency and cut quality.

Quick Verdict

The Makita XSH03Z is the better saw if you can absorb the $30 price difference. The brushless motor lasts longer, runs cooler, and cuts more per charge. The DeWalt DCS391 is lighter and cheaper, which makes sense for occasional use or if you're already deep in the 20V MAX ecosystem.

Framing and rough carpentry: DeWalt DCS391

Lighter, cheaper, and 5,150 RPM gets through studs quickly. Cut quality matters less here.

Finish carpentry and sheet goods: Makita XSH03Z

Brushless motor delivers consistent speed under load. Built-in dust blower keeps your pencil line visible.

High-volume cutting (decks, fences): Makita XSH03Z

Brushless motor means 50% more cuts per battery charge. That adds up over 100+ rip cuts on a deck job.

Specs at a Glance

SpecDeWalt DCS391Makita XSH03Z
Blade Size6-1/2 in6-1/2 in
Depth of Cut (90 deg)2-1/4 in2-1/4 in
Depth of Cut (45 deg)1-5/8 in1-5/8 in
No-Load Speed5,150 RPM5,000 RPM
Battery Platform20V MAX18V LXT
Weight (bare)6.9 lb (bare)7.3 lb (bare)
Brake TypeElectric brakeElectric brake + Auto-start wireless system

DeWalt DCS391

Price: $139 (Home Depot)

Pros

  • 2-1/4 inch depth at 90 degrees cuts through 2x lumber with room to spare
  • 5,150 RPM produces clean cuts in plywood without excessive tearout
  • Magnesium shoe stays flat and resists bending from drops

Cons

  • Brushed motor draws more power and wears out faster than brushless
  • 6.9 lb bare is on the heavier side for a 6-1/2 inch saw
  • No dust port adapter included in the box

Makita XSH03Z

Price: $169 (Amazon)

Pros

  • Brushless motor runs cooler and gets 50%+ more cuts per charge than the DCS391
  • AWS (Auto-start Wireless System) turns on a paired dust extractor automatically
  • Built-in dust blower keeps the cut line visible without stopping to clear debris

Cons

  • $30 more than the DeWalt for a bare tool
  • 7.3 lb is the heaviest in this comparison
  • AWS adapter for the dust extractor is sold separately

Best For

Framing and rough carpentry

DeWalt DCS391

Lighter, cheaper, and 5,150 RPM gets through studs quickly. Cut quality matters less here.

Finish carpentry and sheet goods

Makita XSH03Z

Brushless motor delivers consistent speed under load. Built-in dust blower keeps your pencil line visible.

High-volume cutting (decks, fences)

Makita XSH03Z

Brushless motor means 50% more cuts per battery charge. That adds up over 100+ rip cuts on a deck job.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use 7-1/4 inch blades on either saw?

No. Both use 6-1/2 inch blades only. A 7-1/4 inch blade won't fit the arbor guard. If you need full-depth 2x6 cuts in a single pass, look at a 7-1/4 inch saw.

Do these cut 2x4s in one pass?

Yes. A 2x4 is actually 1-1/2 inches thick. Both saws cut 2-1/4 inches deep at 90 degrees, which clears a 2x4 with 3/4 inch to spare.

Is the brushed vs brushless difference really noticeable?

On a single cut, no. Over a full day of cutting, absolutely. The brushless XSH03Z will still be running strong on its second battery while the brushed DCS391 is chewing through its third. The motor also runs cooler, which extends its total lifespan.

Specs come from manufacturer data sheets. Prices were verified at Home Depot, Lowe's, and Amazon in April 2026. We don't run a testing lab. All claims trace back to publicly available data. Full methodology.